Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 36-38, March 2010

The Optimal Metal-Metal Arthroplasty Is Not a Surface Replacement—Opposes

  • Thomas P. Vail, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Thomas P. Vail, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MU320W, San Francisco, CA 94143

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of California, San Francisco, CA

A hip resurfacing arthroplasty has all the characteristics of an optimized metal on metal bearing: low surface roughness, head sphericity, low clearance, high carbon alloy metallurgy, and a larger diameter. Both wear simulation in the laboratory and clinical experience demonstrate that large diameter metal bearings with optimized clearance have the potential for low metal ion wear production. In addition, hip resurfacing can maintain normal hip mechanics. Hip resurfacing is the only metal bearing option that allows femoral bone conservation. There are situations where the femoral head bone is not sufficiently healthy or mechanically sound to warrant preservation. However, when the goal is bone conservation, and a metal bearing is indicated, there is no substitute in today's technology for a hip resurfacing.

Keywords: hip resurfacing, metal bearing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competing interests: Dr Vail is a consultant for DePuy, a J&J Company and has received royalties.

PII: S1045-4527(10)00005-2

doi:10.1053/j.sart.2010.01.004

Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 36-38, March 2010