Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 39-41 , March 2010

Femoral Head Resurfacing: Appropriate Patient Selection

  • Aaron J. Johnson, MD
    • ,
  • Michael G. Zywiel, MD
    • ,
  • Qais Naziri, BS
    • ,
  • Michael A. Mont, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Michael A. Mont, MD, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Reconstruction, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 West Belvedere Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21215

References 

  1. Beaulé P, Amstutz H, LeDuff M, et al. Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: Hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2004;8(Suppl 3):54–58
  2. Treacy R, McBryde C, Pynsent P. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167–170
  3. Amstutz H, LeDuff M: Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2 to 12 years. Clin Orthop (in press)
  4. Mont M, McGrath M, Ulrich S, et al. Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:S45–S51
  5. Schmalzried T, Silva M, delaRosa M, et al. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop. 2005;441:200–204
  6. Zywiel M, Marker D, McGrath M, et al. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels—A comparison of postoperative outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67:116–119

 MAM is a consultant for Stryker Orthopedics and Wright Medical Technologies, and receives royalties from Stryker Orthopedics. The remaining authors have no disclosures to make. No external funding was received specifically in support of this work.

PII: S1045-4527(09)00106-0

doi: 10.1053/j.sart.2009.12.020

Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 39-41 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution