Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 50-54 , March 2009

Hydroxyapatite-Coated, Tapered Titanium Hip Arthroplasty

  • Christopher Courtney, DO

      Affiliations

    • Adult Reconstruction, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • ,
  • Bryan Hooks, DO

      Affiliations

    • Humility of Mary Health System, St Joseph/St Elizabeth Health Centers, Warren, Youngstown, OH, USA
    • ,
  • Mark I. Froimson, MD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Mark I. Froimson, MD, MBA, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A41, Cleveland, OH 44195

References 

  1. Chambers B, St. Clair SF, Froimson MI, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated tapered cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(suppl 1):71–74
  2. Froimson MI, Garino J, Machenaud A, et al. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1–7
  3. Sakalkale DP, Eng K, Hozack WJ, et al. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered cementless hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;362:138–144
  4. Mallory TH, Lombardi AV, Leith JR, et al. Minimal 10-year results of a tapered cementless femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(suppl 1):49
  5. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, et al. Minimum ten-year follow-up of a straight-stemmed plasma-sprayed, titanium-alloy, uncemented femoral component in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:92
  6. Hellman EJ, Capello WN, Feinberg JR. Omnifit cementless total hip arthroplasty: A 10-year average follow-up. Clin Orthop. 1999;364:164
  7. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Lewallen DG, Harmsen WS, et al. Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem. Int Orthop. 2004;28:206–210
  8. Dorr LD, Wan Z, Song M, et al. Bilateral total hip arthroplasty comparing hydroxyapatite coating to porous-coated fixation. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:729
  9. Tanzer M, Kantor S, Rosenthall L, et al. Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: A prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:552
  10. Yoon KS, Kim HJ, Lee JH, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cementless femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite/tricalcium-phosphate coating: An 8- to 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:504–508
  11. Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS, Mauriello AJ. Hydroxyapatite: Catalyst or conjuror?. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(suppl 1):113
  12. Yee AJ, Kreder HK, Bookman I, et al. A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;366:120–132
  13. Kroon PO, Freeman MA. Hydroxyapatite coating of hip prostheses (Effect on migration into the femur). J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1992;74:518
  14. Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, et al. Prospective matched-pair analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:783
  15. Rothman RH, Hozack WJ, Ranawat A, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems: A matched-pair analysis of coated and uncoated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:319
  16. Kim YH, Kim JS, Oh SH, et al. Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1682
  17. Hallan G, Lie SA, Furnes O, et al. Medium- and long-term performance of 11,516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1574–1580
  18. Gabbar OA, Rajan RA, Londhe S, et al. Ten- to twelve-year follow-up of the Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem and threaded acetabular cup in patients younger than 65 years. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:413–417
  19. Rajaratnam SS, Jack C, Tavakkolizadeh A, et al. Long-term results of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component in total hip replacement: A 15- to 21-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:27–30
  20. Wangen H, Lereim P, Holm I, et al. Hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years: Excellent 10 to 16-year follow-up results with a HA-coated stem. Int Orthop. 2008;32:203–208
  21. Skinner JA, Kroon PO, Todo S, et al. A femoral component with proximal HA coating: An analysis of survival and fixation at up to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:366
  22. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, et al. Ten-year results with hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old: A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:885
  23. McNally SA, Shepperd JA, Mann CV, et al. The results at nine-twelve years of the use of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:378
  24. Rokkum M, Reigstad A, Johansson CB. HA particles can be released from well-fixed HA-coated stems: Histopathology of biopsies from 20 hips 2-8 years after implantation. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:298
  25. Reikeras O, Gunderson RB. Excellent results of HA coating on a grit-blasted stem, 245 patients followed for 8-12 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:140
  26. Hardy DC, Frassinet P. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral arthroplasties: a long-term study through 29 Corail prostheses explanted during a ten-year survey. Surg Technol Int. 2002;10:237–245
  27. Coathup MJ, Blunn GW, Flynn N, et al. A comparison of bone-remodeling around hydroxyapatite-coated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:118

PII: S1045-4527(08)00069-2

doi: 10.1053/j.sart.2008.11.006

Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 50-54 , March 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution