Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 215-224 , June 2008

From Two Incisions to One: The Technique of Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Anterior Approach

  • B. Sonny Bal, MD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to B. Sonny Bal, MD, MBA, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, MC213, DC053.00, One Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212.

References 

  1. Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: In the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(suppl 1):78–80
  2. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT. Early pain and functional results comparing minimally invasive to conventional total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1153–1160
  3. Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:232–241
  4. Duwelius PJ. Two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Techniques and results to date. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:215–222
  5. Light TR, Keggi KJ. Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;152:255–260
  6. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2235–2246Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003
  7. Smith-Petersen MN. Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949;31:40
  8. Berger RA. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:149–155
  9. Matta J. A one incision anterior MIS approach. 2004;Paper presented at 34th Annual Course: Advances in Arthroplasty: Battle of the Bearing Surfaces and Surgical Techniques, Cambridge, Massachusetts, September 29 to October 2
  10. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, et al. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique: Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(suppl 1):221–233
  11. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, et al. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2432–2438
  12. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1353–1358
  13. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701–710
  14. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, et al. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:86–90
  15. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP, et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:63–67
  16. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:163–172

PII: S1045-4527(08)00020-5

doi: 10.1053/j.sart.2008.02.011

Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 215-224 , June 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution