Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 5-8, March 2008

Reverse Shoulder Replacement: Forward Thinking in Acute Fractures—Opposes

  • David M. Dines, MD

      Affiliations

    • Sports and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to David M. Dines, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports and Shoulder Service, 935 Northern Boulevard, Great Neck, NY 11021.
  • ,
  • Daniel P. Moynihan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Los Angeles, CA.

While most fractures of the proximal humerus can be treated nonoperatively, prosthetic hemiarthroplasty has become an accepted method of treatment. The reported results of hemiarthroplasty in comminuted proximal humeral fractures have given over 80% satisfactory results. In cases of fracture, the main advantage of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is that function and stability are not dependent on tuberosity healing. Therefore, malunion and nonunion may not have the same negative influence on outcome as with conventional arthroplasty. At present, hemiarthroplasty is the safer, cheaper option with more reliably reproducible results.

Keywords: shoulder hemiarthroplasty, proximal humeral fractures

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1045-4527(07)00104-6

doi:10.1053/j.sart.2007.12.022

Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 5-8, March 2008