Retrospective Comparison of Two-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Standard Direct Lateral Approach: A Single Surgeon’s Experience
We retrospectively reviewed the senior author’s total hip experience over a 2-year period (2003-2004), during which he adopted the minimally invasive surgery two-incision approach (MIS). In this series, 126 cases were MIS, while 75 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) were done with a standard approach. There was a significant difference in length of stay with MIS at 2.20 days (2.03-2.37 days) compared with standard THA 3.73 days (3.37-4.09 days) (P < 0.01). The shorter operative time in the MIS group was also significant 98.01 min (93.42-102.59 min) versus 110.12 min (102.08-118.15 min) (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in overall complication rate or rate of reoperation after a minimum 24-month follow-up period. There was also a significant decrease in sequential groups of 42 patients in length of stay, operative time, and estimated blood loss.
Keywords: retrospective study, length of stay, complication rates, direct lateral approach
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This investigation was conducted at The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
PII: S1045-4527(07)00063-6
doi:10.1053/j.sart.2007.09.010
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
