Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 18, Issue 4 , Pages 262-267 , December 2007

Current Status of Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: Results To Date

  • Paul J. Duwelius, MD

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
    • St Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, OR.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Paul J. Duwelius, MD, St Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, 11782 SW Barnes Road, 300 Building C, Portland, OR 97225.
    • ,
  • Lawrence D. Dorr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Arthritis Institute, Inglewood, CA.

References 

  1. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2235–2246Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003
  2. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS. Minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty: Where are we going?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2070–2071
  3. Woolson ST. In the absence of evidence: Why bother? (A literature review of minimally invasive total hip replacement surgery). Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:189–193
  4. Keener JD, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, et al. Long-term function after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:148–156
  5. Klein GR, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Internet claims made by members of the Hip Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:68–70
  6. Berger RA. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:149–155
  7. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:139–144
  8. Duwelius PJ, Burkhart RL, Hayhurst JO: Comparison of the two-incision and mini-posterior total hip arthroplasty technique. J Arthroplasty (in press)
  9. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, et al. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:86–90
  10. Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. The effect of modifying the acute postoperative pain response after total hip and knee replacement using reduced tissue trauma surgery. 2006;Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Chicago, IL(in press)
  11. Dorr LD, Sirianni L, Thomas D: Psychological reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (in press)
  12. Iversen MD, Daltroy LH, Fossel AH, et al. The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;34:169–178
  13. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, et al. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:387–396
  14. Hudak PL, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C, et al. Testing a new theory of patient satisfaction with treatment outcome. Med Care. 2004;42:726–739
  15. Hudak PL, McKeever PD, Wright JG. Understanding the meaning of satisfaction with treatment outcome. Med Care. 2004;42:718–725
  16. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:239–247
  17. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: A comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:153–162
  18. Szendroi M, Sztrinkai G, Vass R, et al. The impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty on the standard procedure. Int Orthop. 2006;30:167–171
  19. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT: Early pain and functional results comparing minimally invasive to conventional total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am (in press)
  20. Maheshwari AV, Boutary M, Yun AG, et al. Multimodal analgesia without routine parenteral narcotics for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:231–238
  21. Hartzband MA. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: Technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:119–129
  22. Howell JR, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:107–118
  23. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:163–172
  24. Duwelius PJ. Two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Techniques and results to date. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:215–222
  25. Archibeck MJ, White RE. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:232–238
  26. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, et al. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2432–2438
  27. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A, et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: An outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:74–81
  28. Healy WL, Iorio R, Richards JA, et al. Opportunities for control of hospital costs for total joint arthroplasty after initial cost containment. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:504–507
  29. Teet JS, Skinner HB, Khoury L. The effect of the “mini” incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:503–507
  30. DiGioia AM, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, et al. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:123–128
  31. Floren M, Lester DK. Durability of implant fixation after less-invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:783–790
  32. Khan RJ, Fick D, Khoo P, et al. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty: Description of a new technique. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1038–1046
  33. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701–710
  34. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, et al. Patients preferred a mini-posterior THA to a contralateral two-encision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:156–159
  35. Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: In the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(suppl 1):78–80
  36. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, et al. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:538–545
  37. Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: The Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:137–142
  38. Eslam PA, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, et al. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: What role does patient preconditioning play?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1920–1927
  39. Swanson TV. Early results of 1000 consecutive, posterior, single-incision minimally invasive surgery total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(suppl 3):26–32
  40. Waldman BJ. Minimally invasive total hip replacement and perioperative management: Early experience. J South Orthop Assoc. 2002;11:213–217
  41. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: A comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics. 2002;25:1031–1043
  42. Pagnano MW, Mardones R, Nemanich JP, et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:63–67
  43. Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:232–241
  44. Inaba Y, Dorr LD, Wan Z, et al. Operative and patient care techniques for posterior mini-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:104–114

PII: S1045-4527(07)00062-4

doi: 10.1053/j.sart.2007.09.009

Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 18, Issue 4 , Pages 262-267 , December 2007

Article Tools