Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 18, Issue 4 , Pages 222-225 , December 2007

Editorial Comment: Why do MIS THR?

  • Lawrence D. Dorr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Lawrence D. Dorr, MD, Arthritis Institute, 501 E. Hardy Street, Suite 300, Inglewood, CA 90301.

References 

  1. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(suppl 4):39–48
  2. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:139–144
  3. Floren M, Lester DK. Durability of implant fixation after less-invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:783–790
  4. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:239–247
  5. Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. 2002;
  6. Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1619–1626
  7. Dorr LD, Maheswari , Long WT, et al. Early pain and functional results comparing minimally invasive to conventional total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1153–1160
  8. Duwelius PJ, Burkhart RL, Hayhurst JO, et al. Comparision of the 2-incision and mini posterior total hip arthroplasty technique. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:48–56
  9. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1016–1022
  10. Clark JP, Hudak PL, Hawker GA, et al. The moving target: A qualitative study of elderly patients’ decision-making regarding total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86A:1366–1374
  11. Hudak PL, Clark JP, Hawker GA, et al. “You’re perfect for the procedure! Why don’t you want it?” (Elderly arthritis patients unwillingness to consider total joint arthroplasty surgery: A qualitative study). Med Decis Making. 2002;22:272–278
  12. Inaba Y, Dorr LD, Wan Z, et al. Operative and patient care techniques for posterior mini-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:104–114
  13. Mahomed NN, Laing MH, Cook EF, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1273–1279
  14. Orbell S, Johnston M, Rowley D, et al. Cognitive representations of illness and functional and affective adjustment following surgery for osteoarthritis. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:93–102
  15. Dorr LD, Thomas D, Long WT, et al. Psychologic reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:94–100
  16. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty (An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755
  17. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) (I. Conceptual framework and item selection). Med Care. 1992;30:473–483
  18. Hudak PL, McKeever PD, Wright JG. Understanding the meaning of satisfaction with treatment outcome. Med Care. 2004;42:718–725
  19. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, et al. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:387–396
  20. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Lingard EA, Losina E, et al. Psychosocial and geriatric correlates of functional status after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:829–835
  21. Chamberlain K, Petrie K, Azariah R. The role of optimism and sense of coherence in predicting recovery following surgery. Psychology and Health. 1992;7:301–310
  22. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2235–2244
  23. Oganda L, Wilson R, Archbald P, et al. A minimal incision technique does not improve early postoperative outcomes: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:699–700
  24. Archibeck MJ, White RE. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:232–238
  25. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, et al. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with the two incision technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;11:2432–2438
  26. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:115–124
  27. Pagano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, et al. Patients preferred a mini-posterior THA to a contralateral two-incision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:156–159
  28. Berend ME, Smith A, Meding JB, et al. Long term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(suppl 2):53–59
  29. Kim YH. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: A prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1092–1098
  30. Maheshwari AV, Boutary M, Yun AG, et al. Multimodal analgesia without routine parenteral narcotics for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:231–238
  31. Dorr LD. Hip arthroplasty, minimally invasive techniques and computer navigatio. (ed 1). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2006;
  32. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, et al. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Peterson versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:293–298

PII: S1045-4527(07)00055-7

doi: 10.1053/j.sart.2007.09.002

Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 18, Issue 4 , Pages 222-225 , December 2007

Article Tools