Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 19-22, March 2007

Percutaneous Pinning for Surgical Neck Fracture: Method of Choice—Affirms

  • Leesa M. Galatz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Leesa M. Galatz, MD, One Barnes Hospital Plaza, 11300 West Pavilion, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.

Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO.

Percutaneous pinning for proximal humerus fractures is an excellent treatment method in appropriate selected patients. Indications include low energy injuries, valgus impacted proximal humerus fractures, fractures with good bone stock, no medial calcar comminution, and minimal tuberosity comminution. Contraindications include high energy injuries, fractures with comminution at the medial calcar and tuberosities, osteopenia, and unreliable patients. Advantages over open reduction and internal fixation include shorter operating room time, less soft tissue stripping around the fracture, smaller incision and less scarring. While there is a steep learning curve, percutaneous pinning has distinct advantages in selected cases, making it a useful part of the armamentarium for treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

Keywords: shoulder, proximal humerus fracture, treatment, internal fixation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1045-4527(06)00089-7

doi:10.1053/j.sart.2006.11.018

Seminars in Arthroplasty
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 19-22, March 2007